AIVA vs Suno
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right music tools.
| Feature | A AIVA | S Suno |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Pricing | From $15/mo | From $10/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free Trial | ✗ | ✗ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2022 |
| Commercial license on paid plans | ✗ | ✓ |
| Commercial license options | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom lyrics input | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom style training | ✓ | ✗ |
| Extend and remix tracks | ✗ | ✓ |
| Film and game styles | ✓ | ✗ |
| Full song generation from prompt | ✗ | ✓ |
| Genre and mood control | ✗ | ✓ |
| MIDI and audio export | ✓ | ✗ |
| MP3 download | ✗ | ✓ |
| Multi-instrument composition | ✓ | ✗ |
| Score editing | ✓ | ✗ |
AIVA — Pros & Cons
Pros
- + Strong for cinematic and orchestral music
- + MIDI export for post-production
- + Free plan available
Cons
- - Less accessible to beginners
- - Free plan limits downloads
- - Less vocal/lyric generation than Suno
Suno — Pros & Cons
Pros
- + Best-in-class full song quality
- + Very easy to use
- + Fast generation
Cons
- - Commercial use requires paid plan
- - Limited control over individual instruments
- - Training data controversy
Verdict
Suno edges ahead with a rating of 4.5/5 versus AIVA's 4.2/5. Suno also offers a free plan, making it easier to try before you commit. Both tools are strong options for game soundtracks and film scores. Read our full Suno review →
Get the best AI tools delivered weekly
Free newsletter with the latest AI tool launches, deals, and reviews.