Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right coding tools.
| Feature | C Cursor | G GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Pricing | From $20/mo | From $10/mo |
| Free Plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free Trial | ✓ | ✓ |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| CLI integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Chat interface | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code completion | ✗ | ✓ |
| Codebase chat | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom models | ✓ | ✗ |
| Inline generation | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi-file editing | ✓ | ✓ |
| PR summaries | ✗ | ✓ |
| VS Code compatibility | ✓ | ✗ |
Cursor — Pros & Cons
Pros
- + Best multi-file editing
- + Understands full codebase
- + VS Code extension support
Cons
- - Expensive Pro plan
- - Can be resource-heavy
- - Learning curve for features
GitHub Copilot — Pros & Cons
Pros
- + Deep IDE integration
- + Very fast suggestions
- + Free for students and OSS
Cons
- - Subscription required for full features
- - Can suggest insecure code
- - Context window limits
Verdict
Cursor edges ahead with a rating of 4.6/5 versus GitHub Copilot's 4.5/5. Cursor also offers a free plan, making it easier to try before you commit. Both tools are strong options for full-stack development and refactoring. Read our full Cursor review →
Cursor full review → GitHub Copilot full review → Cursor alternatives → GitHub Copilot alternatives →
Get the best AI tools delivered weekly
Free newsletter with the latest AI tool launches, deals, and reviews.